DTG, trying my best not to start an argument so, —_—.

How does it prove your point that brain size is NOT a good proxy for intelligence, dodos were closely related to pigeons, pigeons are smart, it wouldn't take Sherlock Holmes to deduce that dodos were probably just as clever, also, living on an island with basically no predators meant they could evolve in any way, when animals have no predators, they tend to get smarter.

Also, I beg to differ, I know people(irl by the way not you) who could not be smart with any words.

And, even? Even? WHAT HAS LITERALLY EVERYONE BEEN TRYING TO TELL YOU pigeons are smart, humans think they are smarter due to their xenophobic tendencies, bigotry, high self-esteem, ect.

What I am trying to say is, whatever bald pink monkeys think, it's actually been found that most animals are probably as smart or smarter than humans, plus, swamp guy, how does not making videogames and spaceships make something inferior in intelligence?? Orcas have no hands, of course they can't make lunar Landers, and anyway, why would they ever want to, however, they are clearly capable of understanding and even speaking human language, and yet humans still can't even nearly understand theirs, if a species with no civilisation whatsoever has to translate themselves to us to be understood, how are we smarter for inventing the wheel and attaching it to a tank of burning dead animals to power a transport machine when they have legs?

Also, actually pigeons CAN comprehend complex mathematical equations, they can tell exactly how far they are from their nest just by the position of the earth's center of gravity compared to their bodies.

Anyway, bye!

Oh, one more thing, CONGRATULATIONS we have successfully beaten the world record for longest argument ever.

~Poecilotheria metallica